Spinal Cord Stimulator Injury Claims are Preempted, Court Rules



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


JACKSON, Miss. - The highest court in Mississippi has affirmed that personal injury claims brought against the manufacturer of a spinal cord stimulator are preempted because the stimulator is a class III device under the Medical Device Act and therefore had premarket approval. Sanders v. Advanced Neuromodulation Systems Inc., No. 09-594 (Miss. Sup. Ct.).

The Mississippi Supreme Court, in a Sept. 30 decision, noted that the claims challenged the safety and effectiveness of a class III device that has received premarket approval by the FDA and are therefore preempted by federal law pursuant to Riegel v. Medtronic Inc. (552 U.S. …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape

April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo

MORE DETAILS