Judge Finds Expert's Ephedra Testimony Deficient, But Refuses to Strike It
March 25, 2002
DOCUMENTS
- Motion To Strike
- Order
- Reports
BIRMINGHAM, Ala. - A federal judge overseeing an ephedra personal injury case has refused to strike the causation testimony of a plaintiff's expert witness, despite finding that it does not comply with federal rules of civil procedure. McLain v. Metabolife International, Inc., No. 01-BU-1801-S (N.D. Ala.).
Judge H. Dean Buttram Jr. noted in an order entered Jan. 23 in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama that testimony offered by Hisham Hakim M.D. is likely deficient under Rule 26(a) of the federal rules.
"Not one of the reports specifically links ephedra, ingested in a particular frequency and …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick