Hatch-Waxman Amendments Do Not Preempt State Law Claims
October 15, 2009
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
PROVIDENCE, R.I. - A New Hampshire federal judge has ruled that state law tort claims brought against a generic drug manufacturer are not preempted by Title I of the Hatch-Waxman Amendments to the Federal Drug and Cosmetic Act. Bartlett v. Mutual Pharmaceutical Company Inc., No. CV-08-358-JL (D. R.I.).
On Sept. 29, Judge Joseph Laplante of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Hampshire denied Mutual Pharmaceutical's motion to dismiss claims that it failed to warn physicians that its anti-inflammatory drug Sulindac. The judge held that nothing in the FDCA prohibits generic manufacturers from post-approval modifications of their warnings, …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach