Judge Says Revised Accutane Warning is Too 'Ambiguous'
January 20, 2009
DOCUMENTS
- Order
ATLANTIC CITY, N.J. - A New Jersey state judge has denied summary judgment to the makers of Accutane, ruling that a revised warning is not adequate as a matter of law because it does not directly address the risk of inflammatory bowel disease. In re Accutane Litigation, No. 271 (N.J. Super., Atlantic Co.).
In a Dec. 10 order, Judge Carol E. Higbee of the Atlantic County Superior Court further ruled that the language in the revised warning is too ambiguous to meet the "adequate warning" standard of the New Jersey Products Liability Act.
Hoffman-La Roche Inc. and Roche Laboratories Inc. …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach