Fla. Appellate Court Says Leaky Roof May Not Have Started Limitations Period
August 18, 2004
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
TAMPA, Fla. - Awareness of a leaky roof does not necessarily start the limitations period when a plaintiff has alleged other latent defects that could have contributed to water intrusion, a Florida appellate court ruled Aug. 13. Wishnatzki v. Coffman Construction Inc., No. 2D03-4127 (Fla. App. Ct., 2nd Dist.).
Florida's Second District Court of Appeal reversed a decision by the Hillsborough County Circuit Court to dismiss with prejudice the complaint by Gary Wishnatzki against Coffman Construction Inc. The Second District said Coffman Construction should be required to raise the limitations issue as an affirmative defense, allowing the parties an opportunity …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
April 08, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

HarrisMartin's Data Breach Litigation Conference
March 26, 2025 - Charlotte, NC
Omni Charlotte Hotel