Facts of Case Legally Sufficient To Support a 'Knowing' Finding & Punitive Damages, Ballard Says



DOCUMENTS
  • Allison’s Petition for Review
  • Ballard’s Brief on the Merits of Cross-Petitioner
  • Ballard’s Petition for Review
  • Ballard’s Response to Farmers’ Petition for Review
  • Dec. 19, 2002, Appeals Court Opinion
  • Farmer’s Petition for Review


AUSTIN, Texas - According to a Brief on the Merits filed recently by Melinda Ballard in her landmark insurance coverage case, the facts of the case are legally sufficient to support a jury finding that her homeowners insurance provider knowingly behaved in a false and deceptive manner in its handling of her water and mold claims. Fire Insurance Exchange, Petitioner/Cross-Respondent, v. Mary Melinda Ballard, Respondent/Cross-Petitioner, No. 03-0312 (Texas Sup. Ct.).

The Nov. 10, 2003, brief was filed in Texas' Supreme Court in support of her June 2003 Petition for Review, and contradicts the no-evidence challenge presented in the April 2003 …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

March 26, 2025 - Charlotte, NC
Omni Charlotte Hotel

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone

June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo

MORE DETAILS