Moldy-Condo Unit Owner Files Oppositions to Defendants' Motions to Dismiss
September 30, 2003
DOCUMENTS
- Plaintiff’s Answer & Defenses to Johnson-Brown’s Counterclaim
- Plaintiff’s Opposition to Association Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
- Plaintiff’s Opposition to Johnson-Brown’s Motion to Dismiss
- Plaintiff’s Opposition to Millennium Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss
WASHINGTON - Plaintiffs in one of several mold-related cases against the developers of the Ritz-Carlton Residences in Washington, D.C., recently filed oppositions to various motions to dismiss that had been filed by the defendants. Alyson Gannon, Individually and as parent and legal guardian of Andrew Gannon, v. 2200 M Street, LLC, et al., No. 03-0003973 (D.C. Super., Civil Div.).
According to the plaintiff's Aug. 22 oppositions, the defendants knew about the toxic mold in the condominium project and consciously decided to withhold that information from the plaintiffs, making this case "in essence" a personal injury case that includes personal property …