Pa. Supreme Court Considers Frye Versus Daubert
April 29, 2003
DOCUMENTS
- Brief of Appellant (Frito-Lay) to Pa. Supreme Court
- Brief of Appellees (Grady) to Pa. Supreme Court
- Pa. Comm. Pls. Memorandum Opinion (April 3, 2000)
- Pa. Super. Ct. Memorandum (Dec. 20, 2000)
- Pa. Super. Ct. Opinion (Dec. 31, 2001)
[Editor's Note: Although this decision does not result from a mold dispute, HarrisMartin editors feel it could have an impact on the future of mold-related cases involving expert witnesses.]
PITTSBURGH - The Pennsylvania Supreme Court is considering arguments in a personal injury/product liability case regarding the application of different standards for introducing scientific evidence, namely Frye and Daubert. Carl R. Grady and Diana Grady, his wife, Appellees, v. Frito-Lay, Inc., a foreign corporation, Appellant, No. 43 WAP 2002 (Pa. Sup. Ct.)
On March 4, the court heard oral arguments regarding Frye v. United States, 293 F. 1013 (D.C. Cir. 1923), …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Water Contamination Litigation Presented by EisnerAmper
May 06, 2025
