State Employees File Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus
April 23, 2003
DOCUMENTS
- Answer to Petition for Writ of Mandamus
- Petition for Writ of Mandamus
CARSON CITY, Nev. - According to their answer to the State of Nevada's petition for writ of mandamus or writ of prohibition, state employees contend that the District Court expressed valid concerns over the "intentional nature" of the State's actions when it denied the State's motion to dismiss a case concerning alleged mold-related injuries suffered by the employees. State of Nevada, et al., Petitioners, v. The Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada, et al., Respondents, and Deborah Aoyama, et al., Real Parties in Interest, No. A440142 (Nev. Sup. Ct.).
Employees at the state Child and Family Services …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo