Developer's Dispute Resolution Procedures Are Unlawful and Unenforceable, Plaintiffs Allege
February 12, 2002
DOCUMENTS
- Defendant’s Motion to Compel Resolution
- <i>Brown v. Centex</i> Complaint
- <i>Gutierrez v. Centex</i> Complaint
- Mold Survey Report on Ten <i>Armas</i> Homes
- Plaintiff Attorney’s Declaration in Opposition to Motion
- Plaintiffs’ Memo in Opposition to Motion
VISALIA, Calif. - Plaintiffs who sued developer Centex Homes for construction defects that have allegedly resulted in water intrusion, mold and insect infestations in their homes are awaiting the court's decision on arguments that dispute resolution procedures included in their purchase contracts are unlawful and unenforceable. Brown v. Centex - Heritage Park, No. 01-196661 (Calif. Super. Ct., Tulare Cty.).
According to plaintiffs' attorney Douglas W. Grinnell of The Grinnell Law Firm in San Diego, Calif., no decision has yet been handed down after the Jan. 2 hearing on the defendants' motion for an order compelling contractually mandated alternative dispute resolution …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Data Breach Litigation Conference
March 26, 2025 - Charlotte, NC
Omni Charlotte Hotel