In Consolidated Appeals, Court Affirms/Reverses In Part Findings Concerning Mold, Defect-Ridden 600-Unit Apartment Complex
April 8, 2003
DOCUMENTS
- Jimenez Opinion
- Lincoln Malibu Opinion
LOS ANGELES - According to an April 2 opinion, a California appeals court disagreed with the subcontractor respondents that suspicion, not actual knowledge, triggered the limitations period, and thus found that the complaint was not time barred in a case concerning numerous construction defects, leaks and mold in a large apartment complex. Lincoln Malibu Meadows, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Hughes Roofing, et al., Defendants and Respondents, No. B147299; L.C.A.C., Inc., Cross-Complainant and Appellant, v. Lee Bolin & Associates, et al., Cross-Defendants and Respondents, No. B150576; Lincoln Malibu Meadows, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Lee Bolin & Associates, …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo