Motions for Summary Judgment Denied in Mold Personal Injury Case
July 19, 2002
DOCUMENTS
- AFC’s Suggestions in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
- Angell Masonry’s Memorandum in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
- Bryant–Ratliff’s Suggestions in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
- Butler Brothers’ Suggestions in Support of Motion for Summary Judgment
- Plaintiffs’ Response to Defendants’ Summary Judgment Motions
- Second Amended Petition
OSKALOOSA, Kan. - All four defendants' motions for summary judgment were denied July 18 in a case concerning personal injury allegedly caused by the mold contamination of a family's new home. Jerome George, et al. v. Bryant-Ratliff Construction Company, Inc., et al., No. 00CV04924 (Kan. Dist. Ct., Johnson Cty.).
The denial of the defendants' motions for summary judgment opens the way for testimony by the plaintiffs' medical experts at the trial scheduled for Sept. 9.
The defendants' motions for summary judgment included arguments against negligence for various construction issues, such as whether the subcontractor that performed the flashing work should …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Water Contamination Litigation Presented by EisnerAmper
May 06, 2025
