Court Finds Testimony to be Offered by Plaintiffs' Expert 'Minimally' Acceptable
March 15, 2011
DOCUMENTS
- Complaint
- Order
- Order
RICHMOND, Va. - A federal judge ruling on pre-trial motions has rejected a challenge to plaintiffs' medical expert in an upcoming mold trial, although the judge found the expert to have "minimally" met the requirements of Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharms. Inc. (509 U.S. 579 [1993]). Sanders, et al. v. UDR Inc., No. 3:10-CV-459 (E.D. Va.).
In the same order issued on March 10, Chief Judge James R. Spencer of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia agreed with the defendant landlord that plaintiffs should be precluded from seeking personal property damages as a sanction for failing …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
April 08, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo