Parties Exchange Briefing on Subpoena Served on Non-Party in Talcum Powder MDL



DOCUMENTS
  • Motion
  • Opposition
  • Reply


TRENTON, N.J. –– The parties in the talcum powder products multidistrict litigation docket have exchanged briefs on a motion to quash Johnson & Johnson’s subpoena served upon non-party Paul Hess, which the plaintiffs argue seeks irrelevant information and exceeds the scope of discovery.

In a reply brief filed on June 11 in the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey, the Plaintiffs’ Steering committee maintaining that a recent opposition filed by the defendants “resounds with the same inaccurate and misleading argument that they proffer in their motion to compel the Inspection of Dr. Longo’s laboratory.”

“Defendants cherry-pick isolated …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Water Contamination Litigation Presented by EisnerAmper

May 06, 2025

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape

April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia

MORE DETAILS