Multi-Policy Dispute Over Superstorm Sandy Loss Belongs in Federal Court, N.J. Judge Rules



DOCUMENTS
  • Memorandum Opinion


CAMDEN, N.J. — A federal judge in New Jersey ruled that his court has supplemental jurisdiction over a Superstorm Sandy case that included claims under three insurance policies that provided distinct types of coverage.

In a Feb. 11 decision, Judge Jerome B. Simandle of the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey said the case should remain in federal court because the non-flood state law claims asserted by the plaintiffs share a factual predicate nearly identical to those asserted against a flood insurer named in the action.

The lawsuit was filed by the owners of a commercial property …

FIRM NAMES
  • Borowsky & Borowsky
  • Clark & Fox
  • Fineman, Krekstein & Harris
  • Friedman & Jacobson
  • Riker Danzig Scherer Hyland & Perretti





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY
Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS