Reinsurer Says Claims in $4.5M Fraudulent Wire Transfer Lawsuit Not Preempted



DOCUMENTS
  • Opposition


ORLANDO, Fla. — Barents Reinsurance S.A. told a Florida federal judge that its lawsuit accusing a bank of negligently allowing $4.5 million in reinsurance proceeds to be fraudulently transferred to a scammer should proceed, arguing that Section 670.207 of the Uniform Commercial Code (UCC) contains no privity requirement.

In a Jan. 8 opposition filed before Judge Anne Conway of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Florida, Barents further contends that the UCC does not preempt its negligence and unjust enrichment claims against Truist Bank because they involve post-transfer activity.

Barents Reinsurance S.A. was required to pay a …

FIRM NAMES
  • Burr & Forman LLP
  • Cozen O'Connor





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Depo-Provera and Current MDL Cases

January 29, 2025 - Miami Beach, FL
The Coral Ballroom at the Fontainebleau Miami Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

April 08, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS