Federal Judge Refuses to Modify Protective Order Shielding Arbitration Documents from Disclosure
January 6, 2016
DOCUMENTS
- Order
WASHINGTON, D.C. — Counsel for a reinsurer that was engaged in a London arbitration against a defense contractor’s captive insurer cannot use documents produced by the U.S. Navy pursuant to an agreed protective order in a separate qui tam action filed against the defense contractor, a federal judge has ruled.
Judge James E. Boasberg of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia held that the terms of the protective order cannot be modified because the attorney was not a party to the order and did not show good cause for modification.
Northrop Grumman Corp.’s captive insurer, Northrop Grumman …
FIRM NAMES
- Donald C. Holmes & Associates
- Freeman Freeman Smiley
- Kilpatrick Townsend & Stockton
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
April 08, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo