Arbitrator, Not Court, Should Decide Whether Party Waived Arbitration, Pa. Federal Judge Rules
September 8, 2014
DOCUMENTS
- Order
PITTSBURGH — An arbitrator, rather than the court, should decide whether a contractor waived its right to arbitrate its claim against a county because the parties’ contract clearly states that “any controversy or claim” arising out of the contract should be arbitrated, a Pennsylvania federal judge has ruled.
On Sept. 5, Judge A. Richard Caputo of the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania held that only the arbitrator has the power to decide whether the parties agreed to arbitrate the dispute.
In July 2010, Luzerne County hired D.A. Nolt Inc. to serve as the contractor on the …
FIRM NAMES
- Antonio Doganiero of Glassberg & Doganiero
- Cohen Seglias Pallas Greenhall & Furman
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach