R&Q Says it is Not Liable for Cedent’s Defense Costs Arising from Asbestos Settlement
December 16, 2013
DOCUMENTS
- Answer, Counterclaim
- Reply
MADISON, Wis. — In response to Employers Insurance Company of Wausau’s demand for more than $520,000 in reinsurance for its settlement of underlying asbestos claims, R&Q Reinsurance Co. contends the reinsurance billing consists of uncovered defense, rather than indemnity or settlement costs.
In its Nov. 27 answer and counterclaim, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, R&Q contends that only sums paid by Wausau in relation to indemnity or settlement costs, as opposed to legal or defense costs, may be used to determine the reduction of Wausau’s retention.
According to the suit, R&Q issued …
FIRM NAMES
- Litchfield Cavo
- Mark C. Kareken
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick