Texas Court Reverses $22 Million Award on Basis of Evident Partiality
September 28, 2011
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
NEW ORLEANS - A Texas appeals court has reversed a $22 million arbitration award on the basis that the sole arbitrator failed to disclose a social and business relationship with an attorney who represented the prevailing party. Karlseng v. Cooke, No. 05-09-1002 (Texas App. Ct., 5th Dist.).
The Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District, ruled that the arbitrator's failure to disclose this relationship might have, to an objective observer, created a reasonable impression of the arbitrator's partiality. The court overruled a motion for rehearing on Sept. 9.
A partnership dispute arose between H. Jonathan Cooke and the law firm of …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape
April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia