Provision Unclear as to Whether Arbitration is Mandatory, Judge Rules
April 12, 2011
DOCUMENTS
- Order
DENVER - A Colorado federal judge has refused to compel arbitration of a $40 million insurance dispute, ruling that the movant has failed to prove at this stage of the litigation that the policy's arbitration provision is mandatory, rather than optional. Lowry Assumption LLC v. American International Specialty Lines Insurance Co., No. 10-2901 (D. Colo.).
On April 5, Senior Judge Walker D. Miller of the U.S. District Court for the District of Colorado determined that the provision is ambiguous and that the movant "must carry its burden to establish that arbitration is mandatory through a factual determination on the issue."
…UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach