Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle: An In-Depth Analysis

[Editor's note: Roland Goss is a partner with Jorden Burt, LLP, resident in the firm's Washington, D.C. office. He is the chair of the firm's reinsurance practice and blogmaster for its reinsurance and arbitration blog, www.ReinsuranceFocus.com. For further information please contact Roland Goss ([email protected] or (202) 965-8148). This article does not constitute legal or other professional advice or service by Jorden Burt LLP and/or its attorneys. Mr. Goss will be contributing to HarrisMartin's Reinsurance on arbitration-related issues on a regular basis.]

In Arthur Andersen LLP v. Carlisle - U.S. -, 129 S.Ct. 1896 (May 4, 2009), the Supreme Court resolved …