Plaintiffs Seek Remand After Defendants' 'Improvident Removal'



DOCUMENTS
  • Motion to Remand
  • Reply Brief
  • Response


LEXINGTON, Ky. -- Plaintiffs in Kentucky have filed a reply brief supporting their motion to remand, saying that the defendants have failed to provide sufficient evidence that the site of the alleged exposure was a federal enclave. Watkins, et al. v. Safety-Kleen Systems Inc., et al., No. 08-224 (E.D. Ky.).

In their July 1 reply brief filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky, plaintiffs Gary and Gina Lee Watkins further claim that all the reasoning for removing the claims fails because the defendants did not receive consent from all co-defendants before removing the case.

…





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS