Court Awards Summary Judgment to Defendants, Says Product ID Lacking



DOCUMENTS
  • Order


LOS ANGELES -- A California court has awarded summary judgment to a benzene defendant, finding that plaintiffs' documentary evidence was inadmissible hearsay. Tan, et al. v. Soco-Western Chemical Corp., et al., BC 288085, Calif. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty.

In the Dec. 28 order, the Los Angeles Superior Court also found that the plaintiff presented insufficient evidence that the decedent was exposed to Romic Chemical's lacquer thinner, sources told HarrisMartin. In the same order, the court also granted a motion made by 3M Co. for summary judgment, saying the plaintiff had failed to show exposure to 3M's Scotch Grip 1300 …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS