Court Denies Summary Judgment, Says Evidence Creates Issue of Fact
January 8, 2007
DOCUMENTS
- Order
LOS ANGELES -- A California court has denied a motion for summary judgment in a benzene case, emphasizing that the plaintiff is not required to show the defendant's product was the factor in the alleged illness, but instead a contributing factor. Espinoza v. Does, No. BC322590 (Calif. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty.).
In the Dec. 21 order, the Los Angeles Superior Court found that opposing testimony offered by the two parties was enough to create a triable issue of material fact.
Victoria Espinoza and Iran Perez claim that Espinoza's work at Amvac Chemical Corp. required her to work with several …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick