Plaintiffs File In Limine Motions, Seek Preclusion of Compliance Testimony
June 2, 2006
DOCUMENTS
- Motion
LOS ANGELES -- Plaintiffs in a California benzene case have filed several in limine motions, contesting the relevancy of testimony indicating the products at issue complied with safety standards. Charles, et al. v. Gans Ink Supply Co., et al., No. BC326572 (Calif. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty.).
The claims of the benzene plaintiffs are set to begin trial on June 16 in the California Superior Court for Los Angeles County.
In a May 23 motion in limine to exclude evidence of compliance with industry standards, the plaintiffs specifically ask that the court preclude evidence that the defendants' products were …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach