Plaintiffs Support Claim for Punitive Damages in Benzene Case
August 1, 2005
DOCUMENTS
- Hearing Notice
- Opposition
LOS ANGELES -- Plaintiffs who have asserted a claim for punitive damages in their benzene lawsuit have filed an opposition to a defense motion to strike that claim, arguing that the defendant has ignored the 'ultimate facts' of the lawsuit. Loyola, et al. v. Union Oil Co. of California, et al., No. BC280498 (Calif. Super. Ct., Los Angeles Cty.).
The July 20 opposition, filed in the California Superior Court for Los Angeles County, also claims that Neville Chemical Co. wrongfully requires the plaintiff to prove their fraud claim in their motion to strike certain portions of the benzene lawsuit.
An …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
April 08, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick