Plaintiff Files Reply Brief In Missouri Benzene Jurisdiction Dispute
January 23, 2014
DOCUMENTS
- Reply
KANSAS CITY, Mo. –– A benzene plaintiff has offered additional support for his motion to remand a Missouri complaint, arguing that the removing defendant has fallen short of meeting the “heavy legal burden” of proving that its co-defendant was fraudulently joined.
In a reply brief filed Jan. 16 in the U.S. District Court for the Western District of Missouri, the plaintiff contends that the defendant “backtracks in a desperate effort to distinguish the controlling authorities.”
Wade Wiederhold filed the complaint, contending that he was exposed to benzene-containing products while working in trucking and lawn and garden equipment industries. As …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Depo-Provera and Current MDL Cases
January 29, 2025 - Miami Beach, FL
The Coral Ballroom at the Fontainebleau Miami Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick