Benzene Defendants Appeal Forum Decision Allowing Alabama Man’s Claims to Remain in Pennsylvania
October 9, 2013
DOCUMENTS
- Answer
- Petition for Review
PHILADELPHIA –– Benzene parties involved in a forum dispute have filed briefs in a Pennsylvania appellate court, with the defendants contending that the trial court erred by denying their forum non conveniens motion given that the plaintiffs have “no” connection to the state.
In an Oct. 4 answer filed in the Pennsylvania Superior Court, however, the plaintiffs backed the trial court’s decision, saying that the defendants have failed to show that maintaining venue in the state will be oppressive and vexatious.
Plaintiffs Thomas and Rebecca Koenig filed the claims, contending that Thomas Koenig developed myelodyplastic syndrome as a result …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
April 08, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

HarrisMartin's Data Breach Litigation Conference
March 26, 2025 - Charlotte, NC
Omni Charlotte Hotel