Plaintiffs Oppose Motions to Dismiss Benzene Complaint, Say Lawsuit Identifies Factual Details about Relevant Products



DOCUMENTS
  • Chemetall Opposition
  • Homax Opposition
  • Sherwin-Williams Opposition
  • Steco Opposition
  • WD-40 Opposition


ST. LOUIS –– Benzene plaintiffs have once again backed claims brought in their Missouri lawsuit, contending that the defense attacks –– including ones asserted by Sherwin-Williams Co. (NYSE:SHW) and WD-40 Co. (NASDAQ:WDFC) –– against the third amended complaint are unfounded.

In separate July 26 opposition briefs filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, the plaintiffs say that their lawsuit sufficiently alleges what products the decedent encountered, the settings in which those encounters occurred, as well as the relevant time periods.

In June, Sherwin-Williams, WD-40, Chemetall US Inc., Steco and Homax Products Inc. moved to …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS