N.J. Federal Court Remands Benzene Action, Cites Procedural Deficiencies
October 16, 2012
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
CAMDEN, N.J. –– A federal court in New Jersey has remanded a benzene action on procedural grounds, after it found that the removing defendants had not obtained consent from several co-defendants.
In the Sept. 28 ruling, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey found that the defendants were unable to overcome the “plainly obvious fact” that at least three of the defendants did not consent to removal within 30 days.
The underlying lawsuit involves claims asserted on behalf of Nilton Cacoilo, who was a member of the U.S. Marine Corps. While in the service, Cacoilo was …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick