N.J. Federal Court Remands Benzene Action, Cites Procedural Deficiencies
October 16, 2012
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
CAMDEN, N.J. –– A federal court in New Jersey has remanded a benzene action on procedural grounds, after it found that the removing defendants had not obtained consent from several co-defendants.
In the Sept. 28 ruling, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey found that the defendants were unable to overcome the “plainly obvious fact” that at least three of the defendants did not consent to removal within 30 days.
The underlying lawsuit involves claims asserted on behalf of Nilton Cacoilo, who was a member of the U.S. Marine Corps. While in the service, Cacoilo was …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's Data Breach Litigation Conference
March 26, 2025 - Charlotte, NC
Omni Charlotte Hotel
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
April 08, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach