N.J. Federal Court Remands Benzene Action, Cites Procedural Deficiencies



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


CAMDEN, N.J. –– A federal court in New Jersey has remanded a benzene action on procedural grounds, after it found that the removing defendants had not obtained consent from several co-defendants.

In the Sept. 28 ruling, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey found that the defendants were unable to overcome the “plainly obvious fact” that at least three of the defendants did not consent to removal within 30 days.

The underlying lawsuit involves claims asserted on behalf of Nilton Cacoilo, who was a member of the U.S. Marine Corps. While in the service, Cacoilo was …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS