Entry of Scheduling Order Point of Contention in Louisiana Benzene Case
October 24, 2011
DOCUMENTS
- Motion
- Oct. 18 Order
- Opposition
NEW ORLEANS -- Plaintiffs in a benzene case have opposed a proposed scheduling order submitted by defendant U.S. Steel Corp., contending that the proposal is an "inefficient discovery schedule." Moore, et al., v. ExxonMobil Corp., et al., No. 11-00747 (E.D. La.).
On Sept. 29, defendant U.S. Steel Corp. moved for the entry of a scheduling order with the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, saying that after a recent status conference, it attempted to reach an agreement with the plaintiffs regarding the scheduling order, but has so far been "unable to do so."
"Trial is one year …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo

HarrisMartin's Data Breach Litigation Conference
March 26, 2025 - Charlotte, NC
Omni Charlotte Hotel