Plaintiff Says Radiator Specialty Can't Prove Product Wasn't Unreasonably Dangerous
July 28, 2011
DOCUMENTS
- Motion
- Opposition
NEW ORLEANS -- A benzene plaintiff has asked a federal court to award partial summary judgment with respect to claims asserted against Radiator Specialty, arguing that the defendant has not presented any evidence to oppose the plaintiffs' claims that the defendant's product was unreasonably dangerous. Wagoner, et al. v. ExxonMobil Corp., et al., No. 09-07257 (E.D. La.).
In the July 15 motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, the plaintiffs alternatively ask the court to preclude the defendant from presenting evidence at trial on the issue of whether the product was defective and whether …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Depo-Provera and Current MDL Cases
January 29, 2025 - Miami Beach, FL
The Coral Ballroom at the Fontainebleau Miami Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick