Plaintiff Says Radiator Specialty Can't Prove Product Wasn't Unreasonably Dangerous



DOCUMENTS
  • Motion
  • Opposition


NEW ORLEANS -- A benzene plaintiff has asked a federal court to award partial summary judgment with respect to claims asserted against Radiator Specialty, arguing that the defendant has not presented any evidence to oppose the plaintiffs' claims that the defendant's product was unreasonably dangerous. Wagoner, et al. v. ExxonMobil Corp., et al., No. 09-07257 (E.D. La.).

In the July 15 motion filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana, the plaintiffs alternatively ask the court to preclude the defendant from presenting evidence at trial on the issue of whether the product was defective and whether …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference: Depo-Provera and Current MDL Cases

January 29, 2025 - Miami Beach, FL
The Coral Ballroom at the Fontainebleau Miami Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS