Chevron Backs Motion for Protective Order, Maintains Discovery is Closed



DOCUMENTS
  • Motion
  • Opposition
  • Reply


CINCINNATI -- A defendant involved in personal injury and property damage case arising from alleged spills and leaks from a nearby refinery maintains that it no longer has an obligation to produce documents in the case, as discovery was closed by court order months ago. Baker, et al. v. Chevron USA Inc., et al., No. 05-227 (S.D. Ohio).

On Sept. 22, Chevron backed its motion for a protective order in a reply brief filed in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Ohio, arguing that the plaintiffs did not answer any questions relating to the document production that …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY
Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS