Defendants Oppose Petition in Supreme Court; Say Federal Question Lacking
May 8, 2007
DOCUMENTS
- Petition
- Response Brief
WASHINGTON, D.C. -- Defendants in an Alabama benzene case have opposed a petition seeking review from the nation's highest court, contending that the U.S. Supreme Court does not have jurisdiction because the lower court decisions did not address a federal question. Cline v. Ashland Inc., et al., No. 06-1329 (U.S. Sup. Ct.).
In the May 1 response, the defendants claim that the petition should be denied because Jack Cline's widow did not establish that "a question of substantial constitutional importance is presented."
Martha Jane Cline asked the U.S. Supreme Court on April 2 to determine whether Alabama's "perverse" statute of …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick