Plaintiffs Seek Exclusion of Epidemiology, Toxicology, Oncology Testimony
August 19, 2010
DOCUMENTS
- Mundt/Pyatt Motion
- Patrick Motion
- Sarna Motion
- Spencer Motion
NEW ORLEANS -- Plaintiffs in a Louisiana benzene case involving the exposures of three individuals have filed motions seeking the exclusion of a number of defense expert opinions, claiming that they are not accepted by the scientific community. C_ole, et al. v. Ashland Chemical Inc., et al._, No. 09-6584 (E.D. La.).
On Aug. 11 and 12, the plaintiffs filed several motions in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana seeking the exclusion of testimony from the defendants' epidemiologist, toxicologist, oncologist and industrial hygienist.
The underlying claims were filed by a group of plaintiffs who claim that …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach