Defendants Urge Court to Reconsider Sophisticated User Decision



DOCUMENTS
  • Motion
  • Reply Brief
  • Response


OMAHA, Neb. -- Defendants in a Nebraska benzene case have asked a federal court to reconsider its decision that the sophisticated user defense was not applicable, arguing that a federal court of appeals has since issued a ruling inconsistent with that decision. Vondra, et al. v. Barton Solvents Inc., et al., No. 07-85 (D. Neb.).

In the motion for reconsideration filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, the defendants ask the court to revisit its decision that said the defendants had to show "reasonable reliance" on an intermediary or, in the alternative, to certify the question …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS