Defendants Urge Court to Reconsider Sophisticated User Decision
September 28, 2009
DOCUMENTS
- Motion
- Reply Brief
- Response
OMAHA, Neb. -- Defendants in a Nebraska benzene case have asked a federal court to reconsider its decision that the sophisticated user defense was not applicable, arguing that a federal court of appeals has since issued a ruling inconsistent with that decision. Vondra, et al. v. Barton Solvents Inc., et al., No. 07-85 (D. Neb.).
In the motion for reconsideration filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Nebraska, the defendants ask the court to revisit its decision that said the defendants had to show "reasonable reliance" on an intermediary or, in the alternative, to certify the question …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Mass Tort Settlements Conference - Sponsored by Milestone
June 25, 2025 - Buffalo, NY
The Westin Buffalo