Texas Parties in Benzene Case Spar Over Kopstein Admissibility, Causation
July 29, 2009
DOCUMENTS
- Causation Reply
- Kopstein/Causation Sur-Reply
- Kopstein Reply
HOUSTON -- Parties in a benzene case pending in Texas federal court are debating the admissibility of Dr. Melvyn Kopstein as well as whether there is sufficient evidence to back the plaintiff's contention that he developed multiple myeloma as a result of benzene exposure. Brown v. Shell Oil Co., et al., No. 08-00413 (S.D. Texas).
In a reply brief filed July 1 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the Shell defendants backed their efforts to exclude the testimony of Melvyn Kopstein, saying that the plaintiff's response does not contain "any argument or legal authority regarding …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape
April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia