Texas Parties in Benzene Case Spar Over Kopstein Admissibility, Causation
July 29, 2009
DOCUMENTS
- Causation Reply
- Kopstein/Causation Sur-Reply
- Kopstein Reply
HOUSTON -- Parties in a benzene case pending in Texas federal court are debating the admissibility of Dr. Melvyn Kopstein as well as whether there is sufficient evidence to back the plaintiff's contention that he developed multiple myeloma as a result of benzene exposure. Brown v. Shell Oil Co., et al., No. 08-00413 (S.D. Texas).
In a reply brief filed July 1 in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Texas, the Shell defendants backed their efforts to exclude the testimony of Melvyn Kopstein, saying that the plaintiff's response does not contain "any argument or legal authority regarding …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach