Defendant: Valves 'Passive Holder' of Asbestos, No Duty Owed
February 7, 2008
DOCUMENTS
- <i>Amici</i> Brief
- Response Brief
SAN FRANCISCO -- Saying its valve products did not "create or contribute to the danger to be warned against," defendant Leslie Controls has asked an appellate court to affirm a trial court ruling awarding summary judgment to the manufacturer. Taylor, et al. v. Crane Co., et al., No. A117648 (Calif. Ct. App., 1st Dist., Div. 5).
In the Jan. 22 brief filed in the California First District Court of Appeal, Leslie Controls claims the trial court ruling was correct because it cannot owe a duty to warn of dangers posed by products manufactured and supplied by other companies.
In the …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape
April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia

HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
April 08, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach