Household Exposure Duty Rejected, Court Says Liability Would be 'Limitless'
January 3, 2008
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
WILMINGTON, Del. -- A Delaware Superior Court has awarded summary judgment to an asbestos defendant in a take-home exposure case, finding that the relationship between the company and the wife of a former employee was "too tenuous to support a legal duty of care." In re: Asbestos Litigation, Limited To: Lillian Riedel, No. 04C-07-099-ASB (Del. Super. Ct., New Castle Cty.).
In the Dec. 21 opinion, the New Castle County Superior Court rejected the idea of "transferred negligence," stating that while the defendant owed a duty to its employee, the same employee's wife was not a reasonably foreseeable victim.
"ICI …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape
April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia