Court Finds Plaintiff Failed to Identify Products, Affirms Summary Judgment
October 10, 2006
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
SEATTLE -- The Washington Court of Appeals has affirmed a summary judgment award to asbestos defendant Cutler-Hammer, saying that the plaintiff failed to prove he worked with the company's asbestos-containing products. Hautala v. Cutler-Hammer Inc., et al., No. 56701-2-I (Wash. Ct. App., Div. 1).
In the Sept. 11 opinion, the appellate court also found that the plaintiff could not even prove that the products were present at his place of employment, further warranting the dismissal.
Jim Hautala claimed that his work as an electrician exposed him to asbestos and caused his lung disease. Hautala named Cutler-Hammer in his complaint, saying …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick