Co-Worker's Contradictory Testimony Insufficient to Raise Product ID Question, Court Holds
September 18, 2002
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
PHILADELPHIA - The contradictory testimony of a woman who claimed to have seen a fellow employee working with a specific asbestos product, then recanted claiming she had not interest in knowing what products were being used, cannot be applied to defeat summary judgment, a state appeals court has held. Wilson, et al. v. A.P. Green Industries, Inc., et al., No. 3493 EDA 2001 (Pa. Super. Ct.).
In one of several recent asbestos rulings, the Pennsylvania Superior Court on Sept. 16 affirmed summary judgment for Flinkote Co., one of several defendants named in a suit filed on behalf of Dolly F. …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach
HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference
February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick