Asbestos Defendant Not Required to Arbitrate Products/Premises Coverage Dispute
September 29, 2004
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
ST. PAUL, Minn. - A dispute over the application of insurance coverage to an asbestos defendants' premise operations claims should not be submitted to arbitration when there is no evidence that the defendant ever signed an agreement requiring it to arbitrate such disputes, a state appeals court has held. St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. API Inc., No. A04-204 (Minn. Ct. App.).
In a Sept. 28 decision affirming the denial of an insurer's motion to compel arbitration of the policy dispute, the Minnesota Court of Appeals said that given the lack of evidence, it cannot be determined as …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES
HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference
January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach