Appeals Court: Decision to Exclude Expert Testimony Prejudiced Asbestos Plaintiff



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


FRANKFORT, Ky. - A trial court erred when it refused to exclude testimony from a defense expert who challenged the plaintiff's claims that he suffered from asbestosis as a result of his occupational asbestos exposure, a state appeals court has ruled. Clephas v. Garlock, Inc., No. 2003-CA-001276-MR (Ky. Ct. App.).

In an opinion issued July 30, the Kentucky Court of Appeals said that the opinions provided by the expert at trial prejudiced plaintiff Charles Clephas because they were not previously disclosed in accordance with the state's rules of civil procedure.

'The discovery of the substance of an expert witness's expected …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY
Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS