Whittaker, Clark & Daniels Files Reply Brief Supporting Motion to Dismiss Cosmetic Asbestos Talcum Powder Claims



DOCUMENTS
  • Motion
  • Opposition
  • Reply


PITTSBURGH, Pa. –– Whittaker, Clark & Daniels has filed a reply brief supporting its effort to dismiss cosmetic asbestos talcum powder claims, maintaining that there is no evidence to demonstrate that the decedent was exposed to any talcum powder that contained talc supplied by the company.

In a reply brief filed recently in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas for Allegheny County, WCD said that there is no evidence that the plaintiff used any product containing its talc, or that the talc contains asbestos.

In an amended complaint, the plaintiffs in the underlying case stated that Mary Herron frequently …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY
Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS