Court's Asbestos 'Sophistication' Not Enough to Spur Venue Transfer



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


TACOMA, Wash. - Sophistication of a trial court in handling asbestos claims is not a factor that may be considered in determining a motion to change venue, a Washington state appeals court has ruled. Hatley v. Saberhagen Holdings, Inc., No. 28394-8-II (Wash. App. Ct., Div. II).

In an Aug. 5 decision reversing a trial judge's order to move plaintiff Carl Hatley's asbestos case to a neighboring county, the Washington Court of Appeals said that the transferee court's sophisticated procedures for handling such claims should have been excluded from the discussion of whether the case belonged in the venue where Hatley …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape

April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin's Webinar Series: Water Contamination Litigation Presented by EisnerAmper

May 06, 2025

MORE DETAILS