Montana Remands Asbestos Case, Says State is Valid Defendant and Diversity in the Suit Does Not Exist



DOCUMENTS
  • Order


GREAT FALLS, Mont. –– A Montana federal court has adopted a recommendation that an asbestos suit be remanded to state court, finding that the State of Montana was a valid defendant in the action and, therefore, complete diversity did not exist.

In the Jan. 30 order, the U.S. District Court for the District of Montana opined that removing defendant Burlington Northern Santa Fe Railway Company (BNSF) has “failed to show that the State is not a party to this action” and that “diversity in this case does not exist.”

Plaintiff Timothy McDowell asserted the claims on behalf of his late …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY
Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS