N.J. Court Retains Jurisdiction over Asbestos Naval Exposure Suit, Rejects Challenges to Defense Removal Evidence
September 2, 2014
DOCUMENTS
- Opinion
TRENTON, N.J. ¬¬– A New Jersey federal court has rejected plaintiff efforts to remand an asbestos suit, saying that it does not need to determine the credibility of the defendants’ removal evidence “at this procedural juncture.”
In the Aug. 29 opinion, the U.S. District Court for the District of New Jersey wrote that instead it is only required to analyze the sufficiency of the facts which could establish a complete defense at trial.
The plaintiffs contended in their lawsuit that Arthur Hammell was exposed to asbestos during various time periods between 1950 and the 1970s, according to the order. Specifically, …
UPCOMING CONFERENCES

HarrisMartin's Justice for All Conference: Complex Litigation in Philadelphia's Evolving Legal Landscape
April 15, 2025 - Philadelphia, PA
The Logan Philadelphia