Trade Groups Challenge W.Va. Court's Interpretation of Occupational Disease Law



DOCUMENTS
  • Amici Brief
  • Rhodes Opinion


CHARLESTON, W.Va. - Several groups representing claimants with alleged occupational disease are petitioning the West Virginia Supreme Court, arguing that its recent decision placing absolute evidentiary burden on the claimant is unconstitutional because it treats certain workers' comp claims differently than others. Rhodes v. Workers' Compensation Division, No. 27831 (W.Va. Sup. Ct. App.).

In the objectors' brief filed Jan. 19 in West Virginia Supreme Court of Appeals, amici claim the standards upheld by the court's Dec. 11 decision create a complex environment for the adjudication of otherwise routine occupational claims.

The problem, the brief says, lies in the court's interpretation …






UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's MDL Conference

December 04, 2024 - New York, NY
Virgin Hotels NYC

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS