Utah Court Vacates Deadlines in Asbestos Case, Waits for Motion to Substitute for Deceased Plaintiff



DOCUMENTS
  • Opinion


SALT LAKE CITY, Utah –– A Utah federal court has vacated all deadlines in an asbestos case, noting that while counsel for a deceased plaintiff had yet to properly seek the addition of a new plaintiff to the action, re-working the scheduling order when the addition occurs would protect the interests of the plaintiffs.

In the Dec. 13 opinion, the U.S. District Court for the District of Utah wrote that when the plaintiff is properly added, it will establish a new scheduling order, including new discovery deadlines.

Plaintiff Aaron Anderson filed the lawsuit, contending that his diagnosis of …

FIRM NAMES
  • Brayton Purcell
  • Eisenberg & Gilchrist
  • Kipp & Christian





UPCOMING CONFERENCES




HarrisMartin's New Jersey Asbestos Litigation Conference

February 27, 2025 - New Brunswick, NJ
Hyatt Regency New Brunswick

MORE DETAILS



HarrisMartin’s Artificial Stone Silicosis Epidemic Litigation Conference

January 10, 2025 - Long Beach, CA
The Westin Long Beach

MORE DETAILS